On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:23:26AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

> As I mentioned above (and, Simon agreed), I think we can
> agree if [2/3] patch was exchanged

Do you mean that patch 2/3 should be replaced with soemthing else - if
so what should it be replaced by?  I've not seen an updated version of
this series...