From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page"
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:06:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150327100612.GB1562@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150327002554.GA5527@verge.net.au>
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:25:54AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 08:29:21AM -0700, Tyler Baker wrote:
> > On 26 March 2015 at 06:36, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:39:39AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:13:58AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > >> > I think we now have a new error: (seen with omap2plus_defconfig)
> > >> > on next-20150324 :
> > >> > ./arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds:677: undefined symbol `__hyp_idmap_size'
> > >> > referenced in expression
> > >> > make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
> > >>
> > >> Thanks, I am seeing that too.
> > >>
> > >> My armchair suggestion is that the following should be reverted.
> > >>
> > >> e60a1fec44a2f ("ARM: kvm: implement replacement for ld's LOG2CEIL()")
> > >> 06f75a1f62000 ("ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page")
> > >
> > > Can you try again with the latest -next please? We've merged an additional
> > > patch aimed at sorting this out. Reverting isn't really an option, as
> > > there's an awful lot of code that depends on the bounce page removal.
> >
> > Here are the kernelci.org -next results[1], if you click the build
> > status you can dig down into the build failures. next-20150326 has now
> > hit a compiler bug, Arnd mentioned he was looking into this issue.
>
> I have confirmed that next-20150326 does not compile without
> the following reverted:
>
> 12eb3e833961 ("ARM: kvm: assert on HYP section boundaries not actual code size")
> e60a1fec44a2 ("ARM: kvm: implement replacement for ld's LOG2CEIL()")
> 06f75a1f6200 ("ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page")
Thanks for testing this and sorry for the continued breakage. Which
toolchain did you say you were using? Ard has some more patches trying to
fix this, but none of our toolchains seem to tickle the issue.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-27 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-24 0:45 Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page" Simon Horman
2015-03-24 0:52 ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24 0:53 ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24 8:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 16:13 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-03-26 0:39 ` Simon Horman
2015-03-26 13:36 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 15:29 ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-27 0:25 ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 10:06 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-03-27 11:55 ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 15:18 ` Tyler Baker
[not found] ` <7hbnj99epe.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
2015-03-31 21:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-31 22:10 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 9:37 ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3 (was: Re: Possible re Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-01 9:47 ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3 Marc Zyngier
2015-04-01 19:40 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-01 21:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 21:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-02 7:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-02 19:12 ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-02 21:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-02 21:53 ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-07 17:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 20:17 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 22:41 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 22:53 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 23:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-08 0:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 19:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 8:58 ` Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page" Will Deacon
2015-04-01 13:54 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-01 18:12 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150327100612.GB1562@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).