From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 14:13:39 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Fix fallout from per-user struct clk patches Message-Id: <20150405141339.GF4027@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> List-Id: References: <20150403171149.GC13898@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: ALSA Development Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Media Mailing List , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Andrew Lunn , Daniel Mack , Gregory Clement , Haojian Zhuang , Jaroslav Kysela , Jason Cooper , Kevin Hilman , Laurent Pinchart , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mike Turquette , Robert Jarzmik , Roland Stigge , Sebastian On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 11:04:56AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Russell, > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > Sorry for posting this soo close to the 4.1 merge window, I had > > completely forgotten about this chunk of work I did earlier this > > month. > > > > The per-user struct clk patches rather badly broke clkdev and > > various other places. This was reported, but was forgotten about. > > Really, the per-user clk stuff should've been reverted, but we've > > lived with it far too long for that. > > > > So, our only other option is to now rush these patches into 4.1 > > and hope for the best. > > > > The series cleans up quite a number of places too... > > Thanks for your patches! > > Can you please tell which are critical fixes for regressions, and which are > cleanups? It's not so obvious to me from the patch descriptions. The 5th one is the most important as far as fixing the regression caused by the per-user clk patches. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.