From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "staging: board: disable as it breaks the build"
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:44:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150408004400.GA3456@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX1uHq23h_qsq2csTSYbAhN9ZDdMviDi=KtbLuWucYWXA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:41:58PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> This reverts commit d13778d537a0ed6115d2a79a942af999cfb8eec6.
> >>
> >> Commit 13c11072536f2613 ("staging:board: remove unnecessary function")
> >> fixed the build of drivers/staging/board/board.c.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
>
> Acked-by? Reviewed-by? Tested-by? Rejected-by?
To be honest I was flipping between Signed-off-by and Acked-by.
But it seems you don't think either of those would be appropriate.
So how about:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-08 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-03 12:41 [PATCH/RFC 0/6] staging: board: armadillo800eva: Board staging for sh_mobile_lcdc_fb Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] Revert "staging: board: disable as it breaks the build" Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-06 0:40 ` Simon Horman
2015-04-07 13:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-08 0:44 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2015-04-03 12:41 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/6] staging: board: Initialize staging board code earlier Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-03 12:42 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/6] staging: board: Add support for translating hwirq to virq numbers Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-06 10:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-04-03 12:42 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/6] staging: board: kzm9d: Translate hwirq numbers " Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-03 12:42 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/6] staging: board: Add support for devices with complex dependencies Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-03 12:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-04-03 13:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-03 17:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-03 17:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-05 8:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-04 12:46 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-04-05 9:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-05 20:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-04-03 12:42 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/6] staging: board: armadillo800eva: Board staging for sh_mobile_lcdc_fb Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-03 16:24 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/6] " Laurent Pinchart
2015-04-03 19:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-06 10:23 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/6] staging: board: armadillo800eva: Board staging for =?UTF-8?Q?sh=5Fmobile=5Flcdc Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150408004400.GA3456@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).