From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:44:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "staging: board: disable as it breaks the build" Message-Id: <20150408004400.GA3456@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <1428064923-24950-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1428064923-24950-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20150406004031.GD1841@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:41:58PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> This reverts commit d13778d537a0ed6115d2a79a942af999cfb8eec6. > >> > >> Commit 13c11072536f2613 ("staging:board: remove unnecessary function") > >> fixed the build of drivers/staging/board/board.c. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman > > Acked-by? Reviewed-by? Tested-by? Rejected-by? To be honest I was flipping between Signed-off-by and Acked-by. But it seems you don't think either of those would be appropriate. So how about: Reviewed-by: Simon Horman