From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 12:57:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] spi: Re-do the returning value of rspi_dma_check_then_transfer Message-Id: <20150507125744.GX15510@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="kkHPdTSmtjV9vJ2x" List-Id: References: <1430359932-13245-1-git-send-email-cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp> <1430359932-13245-2-git-send-email-cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <1430359932-13245-2-git-send-email-cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp> To: Cao Minh Hiep Cc: geert+renesas@glider.be, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com, yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com, ryusuke.sakato.bx@renesas.com, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org --kkHPdTSmtjV9vJ2x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:12:12AM +0900, Cao Minh Hiep wrote: > From: Hiep Cao Minh >=20 > To reduce indentation and complexity of code, insteeds of returning zero > the function rspi_dma_check_then_transfer should return rspi_dma_transfer > directly after checking error. Applied, thanks. Please use subject lines reflecting the style for the subsystem and don't send cover letters for single patches - if there's any content in there it's usually a sign that the changelog is not detailed enough. --kkHPdTSmtjV9vJ2x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVS2FHAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ3k8H/0YNH5bwhcWTgqnzJV3k68Nu 8/J5HI9Rt1dMLxrN/aZSfCm9TT3KlAeV/Qzr730LLiBrVpNdhiO8OfgoedoFMqGy 37kROlRAtTWO7F+Wu0zi9XdGqqUqsKzcD9eTnog4AC12SSpSZ1Af/c8Ll/ZEU1yM 6zI+UxTph05GmJACGzBHykil0FL+pHywki8W5TRapcHU6ltsh4zDCe6QI5kTpHUe 8mGKp8FWIV2ANQJ/wKDzaI7hrIm/NugKra4cFye/ybwAdcx93VhqopD4nBum5Nqg PAd3sOymYPMNiNUj6YuiaZ3lWzotcOyqqPlLYP+iIbJjwIoWPH4Q/sj6spBetbs= =J08m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kkHPdTSmtjV9vJ2x--