From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: rcar-gen2: CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER is always set
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:23:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150713012335.GB25443@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436277927-20159-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 01:26:44PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:56:20AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Simon, Magnus,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:40:18AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > >> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 12:34:47AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > >> >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> > >> >> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > >> >> > HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER used to be user-selectable, but your patch
> > >> >> > "ARM: shmobile: Select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER from Kconfig" made that
> > >> >> > unconditional for R-Car Gen2 and APE6 ;-)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Ouch - my bad! That's not at all what I intended to do.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I only wanted to express that R-Car Gen2 and APE6 come with arch timer
> > >> >> hardware, and in such case the user shall be able to select it. If
> > >> >> R-Car Gen2 or APE6 isn't selected then there is no point in exposing
> > >> >> such choice to the user. But obviously that wasn't what I ended up
> > >> >> doing...
> > >> >>
> > >> >> What would be a sane way to approach this? I think always enabling it
> > >> >> may not work for CA7-based SoCs from Renesas that at least used to
> > >> >> have setup issues with arch timer...
> > >> >
> > >> > Given the current arrangement in arch/arm/Kconfig:
> > >> >
> > >> > config HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > >> > bool "Architected timer support"
> > >> > depends on CPU_V7
> > >> > select ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > >> > select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> > >> > help
> > >> > This option enables support for the ARM architected timer
> > >> >
> > >> > It seems to me that a good solution would be to (go back to?)
> > >> > * not selecting HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER in arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig and;
> > >> > * enabling HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER in defconfigs as appropriate
> > >>
> > >> That is one idea for sure.
> > >>
> > >> > Perhaps that can be achieved by dropping/reverting
> > >> > * 731bde02f622 ARM: shmobile: Select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER from Kconfig
> > >> > * b46ddcdf484c ARM: shmobile: Drop HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER from defconfig
> > >> >
> > >> > At this stage I have not sent pull-requests for the above so I would
> > >> > be feasible for me to simply drop them if we agree on that.
> > >>
> > >> >From my side simply dropping seems the easiest way forward.
> > >
> > > Me too.
> > > Lets sit on this for a day or so and see what Geert and others have to say.
> >
> > Typically the "HAVE_*" config symbols are meant to be selected in
> > Kconfig fragments, not to be configurable by the user, so Magnus' patches
> > did make sense to me.
> >
> > ARM_ARCH_TIMER is the corresponding user-configurable config option,
> > but it is auto-selected by HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER these days.
> >
> > $ git kgrep HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/Kconfig:config HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-alpine/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-axxia/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-qcom/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig: select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> >
> > (`git kgrep' is aliased to `!git grep $* -- "*Kconf*"')
> >
> > Looking at e.g. arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig, a mixed omap 3/4/5
> > multi-platform kernel would have this enabled, too, while it was selected
> > for omap5 only.
> >
> > If having this enabled in Kconfig causes regressions (on CA7 --- I don't have
> > a board with enabled CA7 support), the two patches should be reverted.
> >
> > However, given CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER was enabled in
> > shmobile_defconfig before, I believe such an issue on CA7 would have been
> > present before, when using shmobile_defconfig? Or were all CA7 users rolling
> > their own config files, not enabling it?
>
> I think that the issue is that previously users could select arch-timer,
> although it was configured by default, but now they can't.
>
> It seem odd to me that HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER selects ARM_ARCH_TIMER, but
> it does. And with that in mind, if we want to still allow users to
> select arch-timer, then we should drop the patches.
As they are blocking the progress of other, unrelated, patches into arm-soc
I have dropped the above mentioned patches (731bde02f622, b46ddcdf484c)
from next pending some consensus on if and how to move forwards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 14:05 [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: rcar-gen2: CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER is always set Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-07 15:17 ` Magnus Damm
2015-07-07 15:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-07 15:34 ` Magnus Damm
2015-07-08 1:16 ` Simon Horman
2015-07-08 1:40 ` Magnus Damm
2015-07-08 2:05 ` Simon Horman
2015-07-08 6:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-10 4:26 ` Simon Horman
2015-07-13 1:23 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2015-07-13 5:20 ` Magnus Damm
2015-07-14 10:28 ` Magnus Damm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150713012335.GB25443@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox