From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM: shmobile: Move gpio ranges from C code to DT
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:56:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150817155629.GA8401@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYe5z9vG+Aekdq1wcKdhUUN5bpxQ52RgNt17+bhJbjVEQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:34:33PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:45:55PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> >>> >> Where possible I prefer not to apply non-DTS/DTSI patches on top of
> >>> >> DTS/DTSI patches, I believe this is in keeping with how the ARM SoC
> >>> >> maintainers like things handled. With this in mind I have done the following:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 1. Queued up the DTSI patches (patches 1 - 3) for v4.3 in my dt branch.
> >>> >> I intend for this to turn up in next soon.
> >>> >> 2. Queued up for pinctrl patches (patches 4 - 6) for v4.4 in a pinctrl patch.
> >>> >> I intend for these to be present in the renesas devel branch but
> >>> >> not in next until after the release of v4.3-rc1. I would also be
> >>> >> happy to drop them and let Linus Walleij take these patches for v4.4,
> >>> >> assuming patches 1 - 3 are accepted for v4.3.
> >>> >
> >>> > OK.
> >>> >
> >>> > Will the world explode if I try to queue the pinctrl patches 4-6 in my
> >>> > tree now for v4.3? Then I prefer to defer to v4.4. Else I can merge
> >>> > it in parallel?
> >>>
> >>> There won't be a mapping between gpio and pins in any branch having the
> >>> pinctrl changes but not the dtsi changes.
> >>
> >> It sounds to me that Linus should take his option 2; defer to v4.4.
> >> In which case I should drop the changes from my tree (they are not in next
> >> anyway). Please let me know if thats the way we will move this forwards.
> >
> > Sounds fine to me.
> >
> > And in the unlikely event we discover regressions in v4.3-rc1 due to having
> > the dtsi changes without the pinctrl changes, we can still fast-track them
> > into v4.3-rc2.
>
> Sounds like a plan.
>
> Hit me on the head about this once v4.3-rc1 is out!
Thanks, I will drop the patches from my tree.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-17 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-04 13:55 [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM: shmobile: Move gpio ranges from C code to DT Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-04 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4 dtsi: Add missing "gpio-ranges" to gpio node Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-04 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ARM: shmobile: r8a7740 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-04 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-04 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Stop calling gpiochip_add_pin_range() on DT platforms Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-01 16:04 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-08-04 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Remove empty gpio_function_free() Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-04 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Confine legacy function GPIOs to SH Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-04 14:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-08-05 0:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM: shmobile: Move gpio ranges from C code to DT Simon Horman
2015-08-05 6:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-13 12:29 ` Linus Walleij
2015-08-13 12:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-14 0:30 ` Simon Horman
2015-08-14 7:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-14 10:34 ` Linus Walleij
2015-08-17 15:56 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150817155629.GA8401@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).