Re: [PATCH 0/20 v2][RFC] arm64: Salvator-X sound support

[Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:47:41AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> Hi Simon
> 
> > >  5) - 14): for Salvator-X
> > > 15) - 17): for Salvator-X
> > > 18):       based on 2)
> > > 
> > > 19) 20): posted by Wolfram
> > 
> > Do you have any thoughts the above patches going into topic branches?
> > It seems a bit messy but possible from my light analysis so far.
> 
> what does it mean ?
> What/Which is messy ?

Sorry for my poor choice of words. I was not referring to the code
itself, rather that the patchset doesn't appear to map well
to a single topic branch.

What I see is something like this:

1) dmaengine core topic
2,3) ak4613 driver topic
5-18) i2c+sound integration topics
19,20) i2c driver topic

I think the above can be constructed if you think it is worthwhile.
There are of course other possibilities.