From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:08:56 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/20 v2][RFC] arm64: Salvator-X sound support
Message-Id: <20150918000854.GA12858@verge.net.au>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <87vbb97kci.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
In-Reply-To: <87vbb97kci.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:43:48PM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> Hi Simon
> 
> > > > Do you have any thoughts the above patches going into topic branches?
> > > > It seems a bit messy but possible from my light analysis so far.
> > > 
> > > what does it mean ?
> > > What/Which is messy ?
> > 
> > Sorry for my poor choice of words. I was not referring to the code
> > itself, rather that the patchset doesn't appear to map well
> > to a single topic branch.
> > 
> > What I see is something like this:
> > 
> > 1) dmaengine core topic
> > 2,3) ak4613 driver topic
> > 5-18) i2c+sound integration topics
> > 19,20) i2c driver topic
> > 
> > I think the above can be constructed if you think it is worthwhile.
> > There are of course other possibilities.
> 
> Ahh, OK I see
> I need to send v3 patch-set. Then, I will separate these for each topics
> Does it clear for you ?

Thanks, I think that would help.