From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:50:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Basic GPIO support for r8a7795 Message-Id: <20151006005058.GD12506@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <1441035401-5843-1-git-send-email-ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1441035401-5843-1-git-send-email-ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:20:15AM +0200, Ulrich Hecht wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > I have taken the liberty of: > > > > * rebasing and updating this patch set on top of > > "[PATCH v10 00/07] Renesas R-Car H3 (r8a7795) integration patches V10" > > * Updating the patch set to to once again have clock-output-names using the > > following update below provided to me by Geert - hopefully that > > merry-go-round has now paused for v4.4. > > * Updating the clock definition order by folding in > > "arm64: dts: r8a7795: add GPIO clocks" > > > > I would greatly appreciate if you and any other interested parties could > > review the result which can be found in the topic/r8a7795-gpio-v1.rebase2 > > branch of the renesas tree. If you find any problems please repost the > > patch set at your earliest convenience. > > Thanks a lot, codewise that looks perfect to me. I believe, however, > that in "arm64: dts: r8a7795: add GPIO clocks" there is a > "Signed-off-by: " missing before Morimoto-san's name. Should I > add/repost that, or is it easier if you touched it up in your branch? Sorry about that Morimoto-san. I suggest we fix that the next time either of us have to update the patches as there are several topic branches sitting on top of this one so I think its best to batch respinning them.