Re: renesas-drivers-2015-10-13-v4.3-rc5

[Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:28:45PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> I've pushed renesas-drivers-2015-10-13-v4.3-rc5 to
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git
> This tree is meant to ease development of platform support and drivers for
> Renesas ARM ("shmobile") SoCs. It's created by merging (a) the for-next 
> branches of various subsystem trees and (b) branches with driver code
> submitted or planned for submission to maintainers into the development
> branch of Simon Horman's renesas.git tree.
> 
> Today's version is based on renesas-devel-20151013v2-v4.3-rc5.
> 
> Notes:
>   - As topic/gen3-cpg-v8+fix and topic/arm64-rcar-gen3-v10.1 started
>     using the cpg-mssr driver instead of the cpg-mstp driver, while
>     later integration topic branches still used cpg-mstp bindings,
>     several drivers (e.g. gpio, but that should affect wake-up-by-gpio
>     only) cannot get their module clocks, or their module clocks are not
>     managed correctly (e.g. ravb, which still works despite this).
>     There are 3 ways to fix this:
>       - Convert your dtsi blocks to the cpg-mssr bindings (best),
>       - Re-add clk-mstp.o for CONFIG_ARCH_R8A7795 in
> 	drivers/clk/shmobile/Makefile, and make sure CONFIG_PM=n
> 	(untested),
>       - Use renesas-drivers-2015-09-29-v4.3-rc3 (for the lazy consumer).
>     However, in the light of "[PATCH/RFC v3 0/3] clk: shmobile: Add new
>     Renesas CPG/MSSR DT bindings"
>     (http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg97237.html), all of the
>     above are temporary solutions.

I would like to update topic/arm64-rcar-gen3-v10.1 and post
as v11 for further review both here and in the broader Linux ARM community
at linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org.

Do you recommend updating that patchset for the above? If so in
which way do you recommend updating it?

[snip]