From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eduardo Valentin Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:43:26 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rcar_thermal: use pm_runtime_put_sync() Message-Id: <20151112184325.GB5289@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: References: <87h9kulkfg.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <2060819.A5Wq9BbBOH@vostro.rjw.lan> <1611120.Ji2Kgxk0bH@vostro.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ulf Hansson Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Kuninori Morimoto , Zhang Rui , Linux-SH , Linux-Kernel , Linux PM list , Cao Minh Hiep , =?utf-8?B?RHVuZ++8muS6uuOCvQ==?= , Alan Stern Hello, On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:04:09AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > > OK > > > > If we did that, all devices that had just been unbound from their drivers > > and had runtime PM disabled after that would be set to "suspended" by the > > core, right? > > Yes, that's the idea. I will send a patch we can test. > > > > > If that helps, I don't really have objections. Given this discussion, Is this series of two patches on this thermal driver still applicable? BR, Eduardo > > > > Thanks! > > Kind regards > Uffe