From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: adv7511: really enable interrupts for EDID detection
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:51:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151126135102.GA537@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5656FE75.5080207@metafoo.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1004 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:43:33PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 11/25/2015 09:27 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> >> I guess you mean that the GPIO callbacks include Runtime PM handling
> >> however for irq_chip Runtime PM may not be hooked up so the GPIO block
> >> is in such case is not powered on / get clock enabled?
> >
> > Yes. There is another drawback when GPIOs are not properly requested. It
> > is still possible to request them from userspace although a kernel
> > driver is using them. I am playing with the idea that the GPIO core
> > auto-requests GPIOs which are not already requested but still set up as
> > interrupts.
>
> I think the GPIO core already reserves the pins that are requested as IRQs.
> See gpiochip_lock_as_irq().
I could still export them via sysfs. They were also not showing up in
/sys/kernel/debug/gpio.
> As for PM see this discussion
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1511.1/01645.html
Nice! Thanks for this pointer.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-24 14:50 [PATCH] drm: adv7511: really enable interrupts for EDID detection Wolfram Sang
2015-11-24 21:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-25 6:34 ` Magnus Damm
2015-11-25 6:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-25 7:58 ` Magnus Damm
2015-11-25 8:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-26 12:43 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-11-26 13:51 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151126135102.GA537@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox