From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Norris Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:25:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: alt: Add QSPI device to DT Message-Id: <20160104212515.GA39910@google.com> List-Id: References: <1451903819-19218-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <20160104203136.GB12748@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:42:59PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > Should we document "spansion,s25fl512s" for the benefit of checkpatch.pl? > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt used to point to > drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c for the list of supported chips. > > That seems to have been changed lately. Now jedec,spi-nor.txt includes the > list, but lacks the manufacturers' names, so checkpatch.pl is still not happpy. > > Brian: Shouldn't the manufacturers's names be added? We've had some of this discussion recently: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20151118194340.GF140057@google.com I don't think we can reasonably determine a good list of complete strings, due to historical failures (IMO) in the SPI subsystem. We could add a separate list of possible manufacturers, so people can do the MxN pairing themselves. checkpatch.pl has enough false positives that its author doesn't care to fix that I'm not personally worried about yet another class of them. But if you have good reasons and good patches for the documentation, I'm all ears. Regards, Brian