From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:57:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 31/32] sh: support a 2-byte smp_store_mb Message-Id: <20160106165740.GX6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> List-Id: References: <1451572003-2440-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1451572003-2440-32-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20160105232735.GC238@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160106131321-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20160106114023.GU6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160106134301-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20160106143218.GV6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <568D35EB.7090108@landley.net> In-Reply-To: <568D35EB.7090108@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Rob Landley Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Rich Felker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dionne , Yoshinori Sato On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 09:42:35AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > (I would have thought the presence of working QEMU support would tide us > over providing an easy basic regression testing environment, but people > keep insisting that's not real and doesn't count. But if we can keep it > 99% working until the sh4 patents expire later this year, we can add mmu > and have full sh4 in hardware again with BSD VHDL.) I didn't know there was a 'working' qemu for SH. My personal 'complaint' with SH is its lack of maintainer feedback. I do full arch sweeps on semi-regular basis, and while I know in very board terms how a fair number of archs work its impossible to know everything about all 25+ we support.