From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 01:20:46 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] media: soc_camera: rcar_vin: Add rcar fallback compatibility string Message-Id: <20160112012045.GE3860@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <1452539418-28480-1-git-send-email-ykaneko0929@gmail.com> <1452539418-28480-2-git-send-email-ykaneko0929@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: Yoshihiro Kaneko , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Hi Guennadi, On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:13:30PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hello Kaneko-san, >=20 > On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote: >=20 > > Add fallback compatibility string for R-Car Gen2 and Gen3, This is > > in keeping with the fallback scheme being adopted wherever appropriate > > for drivers for Renesas SoCs. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko > > --- >=20 > Have you seen this patch: >=20 > http://git.linuxtv.org/gliakhovetski/v4l-dvb.git/commit/?h=3Dfor-4.6-1&id= =8E7825d38bbfcf8af8b0422c88f5e22701d89786 >=20 > that I pushed yesterday? Is it wrong then? Do we have to cancel it, if > Mauro hasn't pulled it yet? Or would you like to rebase and work on top of > it? Sorry about this. There are multiple threads of execution going on regarding enhancing drivers used by Renesas SoCs and sometimes things get a little mixed up: this is one of those times. My opinion is that the patch at the URL above is fine and that it would be best for Kaneko-san to rebase his work on top of it.