From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:43:36 +0000 Subject: Re: [v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h Message-Id: <20160112103913-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <1452426622-4471-12-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <56945366.2090504@imgtec.com> In-Reply-To: <56945366.2090504-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Leonid Yegoshin Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Peter Zijlstra , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andrew Cooper , Russell King - ARM Linux , virtualization-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Stefano Stabellini , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Joe Perches , David Miller , linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-metag-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mips-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, user-mode-linux-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, adi-buildroot-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-xtensa-PjhNF2WwrV/0Sa2dR60CXw@public.gmane.org, xen-devel-GuqFBffKawuUor55F778Sg@public.gmane.org On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:14:14PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > On 01/10/2016 06:18 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On mips dma_rmb, dma_wmb, smp_store_mb, read_barrier_depends, > >smp_read_barrier_depends, smp_store_release and smp_load_acquire match > >the asm-generic variants exactly. Drop the local definitions and pull in > >asm-generic/barrier.h instead. > > > This statement doesn't fit MIPS barriers variations. Moreover, there is a > reason to extend that even more specific, at least for smp_store_release and > smp_load_acquire, look into > > http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10506/ > > - Leonid. Fine, but it matches what current code is doing. Since that MIPS_LIGHTWEIGHT_SYNC patch didn't go into linux-next yet, do you see a problem reworking it on top of this patchset? -- MST