From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:30:17 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/33] dma-direct: use node local allocations for coherent memory
Message-Id: <20180110153017.GD17790@lst.de>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20180110080027.13879-1-hch@lst.de>
	<20180110080027.13879-28-hch@lst.de>
	<3672aa56-b85c-5d2c-0c0e-709031b0c0a0@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <3672aa56-b85c-5d2c-0c0e-709031b0c0a0-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-mips-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org, linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Guan Xuetao <gxt-TG0Ac1+ktVePQbnJrJN+5g@public.gmane.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>, linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-c6x-dev-jPsnJVOj+W6hPH1hqNUYSQ@public.gmane.org, linux-hexagon-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad-Gq0aWv8utHQdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, linux-snps-arc-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-m68k-cunTk1MwBs8S/qaLPR03pWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, patches-q3qR2WxjNRFS9aJRtSZj7A@public.gmane.org, linux-metag-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Michal Simek <monstr-pSz03upnqPeHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>, linux-cris-kernel-VrBV9hrLPhE@public.gmane.org, linux-parisc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-alpha-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:06:22PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 10/01/18 08:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> To preserve the x86 behavior.
>
> And combined with patch 10/22 of the SWIOTLB refactoring, this means 
> SWIOTLB allocations will also end up NUMA-aware, right? Great, that's what 
> we want on arm64 too :)

Well, only for swiotlb allocations that can be satisfied by
dma_direct_alloc.  If we actually have to fall back to the swiotlb
buffers there is not node affinity yet.