From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Sterba Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:22:34 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 85/99] btrfs: Remove unused spinlock Message-Id: <20180118142234.GK13726@twin.jikos.cz> List-Id: References: <20180117202203.19756-1-willy@infradead.org> <20180117202203.19756-86-willy@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20180117202203.19756-86-willy@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Stefano Stabellini , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:21:49PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > The reada_lock in struct btrfs_device was only initialised, and not > actually used. That's good because there's another lock also called > reada_lock in the btrfs_fs_info that was quite heavily used. Remove > this one. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox I'll pick this one now, thanks.