From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 12:31:13 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c: pca-platform: additional improvements Message-Id: <20180324123113.u6c3p4u3uxsv2gcc@ninjato> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="sxbkkaxi7blcjj7k" List-Id: References: <20170705101358.17458-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> <20171029172918.2xtz2srh2meq45io@ninjato> <20171207104205.h5ejivdmtharmdln@ninjato> <8564c3ea3b3c4b08b940b02acf501722@svr-chch-ex1.atlnz.lc> In-Reply-To: <8564c3ea3b3c4b08b940b02acf501722@svr-chch-ex1.atlnz.lc> To: Chris Packham Cc: Rich Felker , "ysato@users.sourceforge.jp" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" --sxbkkaxi7blcjj7k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 03:39:47AM +0000, Chris Packham wrote: > On 07/12/17 23:42, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 06:29:18PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 10:13:54PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote: > >>> This series addresses some of the points identified by Andy. The seri= es is > >>> based on top of i2c/for-next. 2 of the patches from v1 have already b= een > >>> applied so I've dropped them from this version. > >>> > >>> I have compile tested patch 1/1 but I don't have access to sh hardware > >>> to actually test the changes on. > >>> > >>> Chris Packham (4): > >>> sh: sh7785lcr: add GPIO lookup table for i2c controller reset > >>> i2c: pca-platform: unconditionally use devm_gpiod_get_optional > >>> i2c: pca-platform: use device_property_read_u32 > >>> i2c: pca-platform: drop gpio from platform data > >>> > >>> arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/boards/acvilon.c | 1 - > >>> arch/sh/boards/board-sh7785lcr.c | 11 +++++++++- > >>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c | 34 +++++++++-----------= ----------- > >>> include/linux/i2c-pca-platform.h | 3 --- > >>> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > >> > >> Series looks good to me, too. I'd need ACKs from the SH maintainers, > >> though. Technically, from Blackfin maintainers as well. But I haven't > >> heard from them in months, so I could go without that. > >=20 > > Adding Rich Felker to CC... > >=20 >=20 > Ping. Was there any movement on this series? I think this may have been= =20 > caught up between the holiday period and various merge windows. Applied to for-next, thanks! --sxbkkaxi7blcjj7k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAlq2RREACgkQFA3kzBSg KbaGLQ/+Pdv4MVTwB8owtCYe7Z278BRh/Rv/JHGLF8u4DXDeemsYlLr7j6iaP56V B6jr1YCoPWEI/zeWHdzp5csrVeW7zOViIQ6UMJv8qcOKbBZCwuufktLTGXB3db36 +8r1c40uW2oRJyljP3MkwMbe0iqnXDUHDzxHmwXn6TqRleMxpHTcio/D+HzOH5LJ mIvk2jdSP2eDKedZ21ZF3z4OZxUgIbo3RvF9R2q/fFCoU1y4vrK9PmiJ9N/fbGVj 7Qx0LBwPET/MS10S+vN2Z6kmivaJvRLzbpsHgHGcqrpAhxqV5I00kU9haO4/sHcv b/UnLURAsG6Z8Fck3rzZY1Y3zkNHUJWhmth9bzRkXTacdhorhtwHGxExX6eE6uRd qQt+hJOaG+26kPqVyy3pq3Sqi4/WspZJR8ekUGaLc8xdMTwAtSrLin9FBPZHHOaI SGvKrAnkadcdchiHGXH4Twb1bE8czLVZxznhHOQwMe7RKeFJpHudVsJ5Mkt6wx73 WcAm8Bqg+YCxveZ9N5DwrXe5SJCrgHz0psxErPU74T7iCvjpH8l1j8cdZnJVZtvL XlvXn156k6AFCVhFR6CZWfYtf/BYWIcXivduAkc6/G2vPsN2/nFN2mvBI6ejkR/q 4G2wghRF3fr3soEcesC+UEWHB6ayRYwVZ/WqfpY7G8PJJJtsXB8= =0aTj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sxbkkaxi7blcjj7k--