From: jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: mm: Fix unprotected access to struct device
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:20:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180417142040.GB3519@w540> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX876iXo-Mio-VxUmR9hq9WFhNtOAn_XdhjFgNvDvXJvg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3441 bytes --]
Hi Geert,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:04:27PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> wrote:
> > With commit ce88313069c36eef80f21fd7 ("arch/sh: make the DMA mapping
> > operations observe dev->dma_pfn_offset") the generic DMA allocation
> > function on which the SH 'dma_alloc_coherent()' function relies on,
> > access the 'dma_pfn_offset' field of struct device.
>
> accesses
>
> > Unfortunately the 'dma_generic_alloc_coherent()' function is called from
> > several places with a NULL struct device argument, halting the CPU
> > during the boot process.
> >
> > This patch fixes the issue protecting access to dev->dma_pfn_offset,
>
> by protecting access to the
>
> > with a trivial check for validity. It also passes a valid 'struct device'
> > in the 'platform_resource_setup_memory' function which is the main user
> > of 'dma_alloc_coherent()', and inserting a WARN_ON() check to make future
> > (and existing) bogus users of this function they're should provide a valid
>
> drop "they're should"?
>
> > 'struct device' whenever possible.
>
> > --- a/arch/sh/mm/consistent.c
> > +++ b/arch/sh/mm/consistent.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ void *dma_generic_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> > void *ret, *ret_nocache;
> > int order = get_order(size);
> >
> > + WARN_ON(!dev);
> > +
> > gfp |= __GFP_ZERO;
> >
> > ret = (void *)__get_free_pages(gfp, order);
> > @@ -59,7 +61,9 @@ void *dma_generic_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> >
> > split_page(pfn_to_page(virt_to_phys(ret) >> PAGE_SHIFT), order);
> >
> > - *dma_handle = virt_to_phys(ret) - PFN_PHYS(dev->dma_pfn_offset);
> > + *dma_handle = virt_to_phys(ret);
> > + if (dev)
> > + *dma_handle -= PFN_PHYS(dev->dma_pfn_offset);
>
> I would keep the WARN_ON() and the (ideally unneeded) dev check as close
> to each other as possible:
>
> if (!WARN_ON(!dev))
> *dma_handle -= PFN_PHYS(dev->dma_pfn_offset);
Looking at include/linux/dma-mapping.h I thought it was good to have
the WARN_ON() as early as possible in the function.
But your one looks nicer indeed!
>
> >
> > return ret_nocache;
> > }
> > @@ -69,9 +73,14 @@ void dma_generic_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> > unsigned long attrs)
> > {
> > int order = get_order(size);
> > - unsigned long pfn = (dma_handle >> PAGE_SHIFT) + dev->dma_pfn_offset;
> > + unsigned long pfn = (dma_handle >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > int k;
> >
> > + WARN_ON(!dev);
> > +
> > + if (dev)
> > + pfn += dev->dma_pfn_offset;
>
> if (!WARN_ON(!dev))
> pfn += dev->dma_pfn_offset;
>
> > +
> > for (k = 0; k < (1 << order); k++)
> > __free_pages(pfn_to_page(pfn + k), 0);
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
I'll resend and append your and Thomas' tags.
Thanks
j
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 13:35 [PATCH] sh: mm: Fix unprotected access to struct device Jacopo Mondi
2018-04-17 13:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-04-17 13:59 ` jacopo mondi
2018-04-20 8:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-17 14:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-04-17 14:20 ` jacopo mondi [this message]
2018-04-18 9:13 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2018-04-18 10:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-18 13:13 ` jacopo mondi
2018-04-20 8:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 9:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-04-20 14:56 ` Rich Felker
2018-05-02 7:41 ` jacopo mondi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180417142040.GB3519@w540 \
--to=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).