From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jacopo mondi Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 07:22:34 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh Message-Id: <20180903072234.GA4116@w540> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" List-Id: References: <1527525431-22852-1-git-send-email-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> <20180831122558.zv7537uyfw5pcnqj@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20180831122558.zv7537uyfw5pcnqj@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Jacopo Mondi , hverkuil@xs4all.nl, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, mchehab@kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Hi Sakari, On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:25:58PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > Hello, > > this series removes dependencies on the soc_camera based > > sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver from 3 board files in arch/sh and from one > > sensor driver used by one of those boards. > > > > Hans, this means there are no more user of the soc_camera framework that I know > > of in Linux, and I guess we can now plan of to remove that framework. > > What's the status of this set? I think it'd be nice to get it in; the CEU > driver is the last using SoC camera framework. > There's an open comment from Geert on this series. I'll resend, then I guess it can be collected. > I guess an ack from the SH folks would be needed for these patches to go > through the media tree. > I would have loved to hear from them on this and other media patches which are sh-related. It hasn't happen, and as for the previous patches removing usage of the old ceu driver for SH boards, I guess this can go in through the media tree. But I let Hans decide how to handle this. > On the sensor driver patches --- please just move the files. The CEU was > the last that it was possible to use the drivers with. > My understanding was that Hans preferred to do it after all dependencies are moved away from soc_camera. Maybe at ELC-E we should have a status-check and decide how to move forward with soc_camera deprecation. Thanks j > -- > Kind regards, > > Sakari Ailus > e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJbjOEjAAoJEHI0Bo8WoVY827QQAL5BBLuOSE1Usaz9SuA9h0MB YGANEAEsK9TKaSpDtRT5mf4IqOAUztETRPnP99kjGV2w2EKQhESRCt7H4wOVHyba 1cSCzXESbwT0Nnb54jkbb/LJX7Cy/ks+jGQGvSBG9y8zC2fTc8zwWGoeXqquJLgN wImMWDdehPiNolJuWQN+9RoXGlXDiYr6Fr9SZuBDtc1THxUToDpGvyXvvs1PfPrP 8sXtZFD6MAnaDDZMk05g63w8z3Q353WfLub6KMLfn4w4ON3j3SZxcTFqGs3PdZA4 OsM6kCM3SdHiGxPR7RVmlqVUn/YyoF1DqOV0GZJzHSZ1TBHunly9guhxbHo7+oCZ wm0BhHgvH7NvvHTfCR5Qvis26pG4/wkjCq96ylK9mSJ+bJ3bb03beown2b6th7d1 smv3R9g/5/UOW230Z3RKGVlDsSrd6ebZ8fcS82fNUHjoHlM2YSOohkeympPcnvoT UkEJ+AKQ9+XgDZOA5Abrbe+/3owhCMbmd8z1y7in+vPekqwuhCWj05vwilYq6BY1 hgxQuAY5CjrfJEhhgFJd/FJ5qtj14h+Hps/rrTp+dQYrqoP1LDXYOVoi9tf7YswP Oii5YpV6c8dyVN5VXCCLho2uUT3pF0sm7Xc+RZxvRskUgx8jAxr1fSyiZGaAV26Q qOXrAaF4G4gIY52Y+jSA =yu/f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--