From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jacopo mondi Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 09:33:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh Message-Id: <20180904093358.GK20333@w540> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="rf72Gf+bfLC8kxKs" List-Id: References: <1527525431-22852-1-git-send-email-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> <20180831122558.zv7537uyfw5pcnqj@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20180903072234.GA4116@w540> In-Reply-To: <20180903072234.GA4116@w540> To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Jacopo Mondi , hverkuil@xs4all.nl, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, mchehab@kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --rf72Gf+bfLC8kxKs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Hi again Sakari, sorry, I'm confusing you On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:22:34AM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:25:58PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi Jacopo, > > > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > > Hello, > > > this series removes dependencies on the soc_camera based > > > sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver from 3 board files in arch/sh and from one > > > sensor driver used by one of those boards. > > > > > > Hans, this means there are no more user of the soc_camera framework that I know > > > of in Linux, and I guess we can now plan of to remove that framework. > > > > What's the status of this set? I think it'd be nice to get it in; the CEU > > driver is the last using SoC camera framework. > > The series went in in the media tree in late June and I now see it in v4.19-rc2. Sorry for the confusion. The other soc_camera series which is pending for approval is the one removing dependencies on the framework from some SH defconfigs: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/4/323 Mauro was exitant to take this one through the media tree, and he's probably right SH maintainers should at least ack the series. So far, I haven't heard from them. I'll try to rebase it on latest version and re-send. Thanks j > > There's an open comment from Geert on this series. > I'll resend, then I guess it can be collected. > > > I guess an ack from the SH folks would be needed for these patches to go > > through the media tree. > > > > I would have loved to hear from them on this and other media patches > which are sh-related. It hasn't happen, and as for the previous patches > removing usage of the old ceu driver for SH boards, I guess this can go in > through the media tree. But I let Hans decide how to handle this. > > > On the sensor driver patches --- please just move the files. The CEU was > > the last that it was possible to use the drivers with. > > > > My understanding was that Hans preferred to do it after all > dependencies are moved away from soc_camera. > > Maybe at ELC-E we should have a status-check and decide how to move > forward with soc_camera deprecation. > > Thanks > j > > > -- > > Kind regards, > > > > Sakari Ailus > > e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi --rf72Gf+bfLC8kxKs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJbjlGGAAoJEHI0Bo8WoVY8fCoP/0F8FsHOYWBYj8TX9i4AOemi w53upV1NL55gJqnTY6jmAcXy1a626rVd5W25f6eHaSigx1Vm9mGXcElpqG7tRCrW 539AgDdtwXjlFEmGFMB57HKSVw8rvrS+IVelPJxPurCB81yGviB0wAIAGglzyp0K xRV4/MTKgWu+L9bnINqUZ+uVHbdLNI4O2BRfSBlOteRDHWb1ybQbTctq2noSzBoq 3GeAS5fUt+/hrQqtXxE/O/1egDH7i52nvdvxnWJO9fvWTuN9Qi5jq+5MrQ1hmEDz 28ZWmnx0XgpnzOkvV81OC8K5hndp3KEsJYyfAgOEPFXD2Ns8oOUzOkvaCGmk9opc hGuW+rNzuydJorKGGd5qm2CpmkdXZiJ1m0sMAgRXamKL0eUVEfl2arwXVzDCSFmU yhOuUYLrRcTv0xKCQjQGj1YgjFDPVbRMqU/zQcvX9Vx9V9SArPfW6zaCu9Od/SsH fREVU1hX83i/j7rFisY4rLf+V6xsn/v2bcG0DzRbrr4owong35PFHdBf4Nqjsd6D 3Sspg2LqAihwgH2dAkYSBwyHqd+xK7WrMg5KAi65hMe+znF1YQusuXbhtjlC0xEv XgTjhoRl2/B7M4muErTK86GyqjYLNTlpWenVQeM5sNtdDYqG2C/xy8orw4olaG0v /G8G/fKwWVrxbY0aoAcX =cbPT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rf72Gf+bfLC8kxKs--