From: jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
hverkuil@xs4all.nl, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
mchehab@kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 10:04:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180904100400.GA28160@w540> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904094319.om6qp5rc3k66ukrd@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2097 bytes --]
Hi Sakari,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 12:43:19PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:33:58AM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > Hi again Sakari,
> > sorry, I'm confusing you
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:22:34AM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > > Hi Sakari,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:25:58PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > Hi Jacopo,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > this series removes dependencies on the soc_camera based
> > > > > sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver from 3 board files in arch/sh and from one
> > > > > sensor driver used by one of those boards.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hans, this means there are no more user of the soc_camera framework that I know
> > > > > of in Linux, and I guess we can now plan of to remove that framework.
> > > >
> > > > What's the status of this set? I think it'd be nice to get it in; the CEU
> > > > driver is the last using SoC camera framework.
> > > >
> >
> > The series went in in the media tree in late June and I now see it in
> > v4.19-rc2.
>
> Oh; I missed this entirely. I thought it'd be merge later as there were
> comments. Anyway it's good it's in. :-)
>
> >
> > Sorry for the confusion.
> >
> > The other soc_camera series which is pending for approval is the one
> > removing dependencies on the framework from some SH defconfigs:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/4/323
>
> Given this series is in the current Linus's tree, that seems like a
> no-brainer now.
Why I don't see it? (just pulled v4.19-rc2).
The only patch that has been collected from that series is
"media: sh: migor: Remove stale soc_camera include"
I don't see the defconfig related ones though.
>
> >
> > Mauro was exitant to take this one through the media tree, and he's
> > probably right SH maintainers should at least ack the series. So far,
> > I haven't heard from them.
> >
> > I'll try to rebase it on latest version and re-send.
>
> If you have further changes, please make them in separate patches.
>
> --
> Sakari Ailus
> e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-04 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-28 16:37 [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] media: i2c: Copy rj54n1cb0c soc_camera sensor driver Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] media: i2c: rj54n1: Remove soc_camera dependencies Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] arch: sh: kfr2r09: Use new renesas-ceu camera driver Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-29 7:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-31 2:48 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] arch: sh: ms7724se: " Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] arch: sh: ap325rxa: " Jacopo Mondi
2018-08-31 12:25 ` [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh Sakari Ailus
2018-09-03 7:22 ` jacopo mondi
2018-09-04 9:33 ` jacopo mondi
2018-09-04 9:43 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-09-04 10:04 ` jacopo mondi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180904100400.GA28160@w540 \
--to=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).