From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:56:50 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] mm: consolidate the get_user_pages* implementations Message-Id: <20190625075650.GF30815@lst.de> List-Id: References: <20190611144102.8848-1-hch@lst.de> <20190611144102.8848-12-hch@lst.de> <20190621144131.GQ19891@ziepe.ca> In-Reply-To: <20190621144131.GQ19891@ziepe.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Paul Burton , James Hogan , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , "David S. Miller" , Nicholas Piggin , Khalid Aziz , Andrey Konovalov , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 11:41:31AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > static bool gup_fast_permitted(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) > > { > > - return true; > > + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP) ? true : false; > > The ?: is needed with IS_ENABLED? It shouldn't, I'll fix it up. > I'd suggest to revise this block a tiny bit: > > -#ifndef gup_fast_permitted > +#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP) || !defined(gup_fast_permitted) > /* > * Check if it's allowed to use __get_user_pages_fast() for the range, or > * we need to fall back to the slow version: > */ > -bool gup_fast_permitted(unsigned long start, int nr_pages) > +static bool gup_fast_permitted(unsigned long start, int nr_pages) > { > > Just in case some future arch code mismatches the header and kconfig.. IS_ENABLED outside a function doesn't really make sense. But I'll just life the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP) checks into the two callers.