From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:23:41 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] remove arch/sh? Message-Id: <20190625142341.GA6948@lst.de> List-Id: References: <20190625085616.GA32399@lst.de> <20190625142144.GC1506@brightrain.aerifal.cx> In-Reply-To: <20190625142144.GC1506@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Rich Felker Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Yoshinori Sato , Arnd Bergmann , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:21:44AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > I'm generally okay with all proposed non-functional changes that come > up that are just eliminating arch-specific cruft to use new shared > kernel infrastructure. I recall replying to a few indicating this, but > I missed a lot more. If it would be helpful I think I can commit to > doing at least this more consistently, but I'm happy to have other > maintainers make that call too. It woud be great if you could at least apply with a tentative ack. At least for some trees we try very hard to get a maintainer ack, so silence is holding things back to some extent. I'd also like to second Arnds request to figure out if any bits are truely dead. E.g. 64-bit sh5 support very much appears so.