From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: afzal mohammed Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:19:13 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq() Message-Id: <20200227110713.GA5708@afzalpc> List-Id: References: <87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Nicolas Palix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Michal Marek , linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Gilles Muller , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Thomas, On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:31:15AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Vs. merging this series, I suggest the following approach: > > - Resubmit the individual changes as single patches or small series > to the relevant maintainers and subsystem mailing lists. They have > no dependency on a core change and can be applied where they belong > to. > > - After 5.6-rc6, verify which parts have made their way into > linux-next and resubmit the ignored ones as a series to me along > with the removal of the core parts. > > That way we can avoid conflicting changes between subsystems and the tip > irq/core branch as much as possible. Okay, i will do accordingly. [ your mail crossed my v3 (only one patch) posting ] Regards afzal