From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 20:04:06 +0000 Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] cacheflush01: Rewrite into new API Message-Id: <20201008200406.GA18136@dell5510> List-Id: References: <20201002202416.28972-1-petr.vorel@gmail.com> <1478290725.17134142.1602069275205.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1478290725.17134142.1602069275205.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jan Stancek Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Ofer Levi , Rich Felker , Yoshinori Sato , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Vineet Gupta , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Guo Ren , Greentime Hu , "Maciej W . Rozycki" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Vincent Chen Hi Jan, > ----- Original Message ----- > > This syscall is currently (v5.9) supported on these architectures: > > arc, csky, mips, m68k, nds32, sh > > constants are missing for m68k, not sure if the testcase is valid for it. > > Untested. > > Test for __LTP__NR_INVALID_SYSCALL saves adding autotools check for > > . > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel > > --- > > Hi, > > FYI: I was going to ask for removal of this test, but all these archs are > > still supported. This test compiles on all archs now, but I haven't run > > it (I don't have access to none of these archs, not sure if LTP is even > > tested on these archs). > I haven't tested it too, but rewrite looks good. > Acked-by: Jan Stancek Thanks for your review, merged. Kind regards, Petr