From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:17:48 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch 10/19] preempt: Cleanup the macro maze a bit Message-Id: <20201116121748.GD3121378@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> List-Id: References: <20201113140207.499353218@linutronix.de> <20201113141733.864469886@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20201113141733.864469886@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Marc Zyngier , Rich Felker , Catalin Marinas , Paul McKenney , Arnd Bergmann , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger , Frederic Weisbecker , Valentin Schneider , Jeff Dike , LKML , Yoshinori Sato , "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller , Russell King , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Anton Ivanov On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:02:17PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > -#define irq_count() (preempt_count() & (HARDIRQ_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK \ > - | NMI_MASK)) > +#define irq_count() (nmi_count() | hardirq_count() | softirq_count()) > +#define in_task() (!(in_nmi() | in_hardirq() | in_serving_softirq())) > -#define in_task() (!(preempt_count() & \ > - (NMI_MASK | HARDIRQ_MASK | SOFTIRQ_OFFSET))) How horrible is the code-gen? Because preempt_count() is raw_cpu_read_4() and at least some old compilers will refuse to CSE it (consider the this_cpu_read_stable mess).