Re: [PATCH 21/20] signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV)

Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-10-21T08:18:21Z

Hi Eric,

Patch 21/20?

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:52 PM Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing
> to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is
> wanted. So change every instance we can to make the code clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

> arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds