From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:13:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220624121313.2382500-7-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220624121313.2382500-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Currently, many architecture-specific non-atomic bitop
implementations use inline asm or other hacks which are faster or
more robust when working with "real" variables (i.e. fields from
the structures etc.), but the compilers have no clue how to optimize
them out when called on compile-time constants. That said, the
following code:
DECLARE_BITMAP(foo, BITS_PER_LONG) = { }; // -> unsigned long foo[1];
unsigned long bar = BIT(BAR_BIT);
unsigned long baz = 0;
__set_bit(FOO_BIT, foo);
baz |= BIT(BAZ_BIT);
BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(test_bit(FOO_BIT, foo));
BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(bar & BAR_BIT));
BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(baz & BAZ_BIT));
triggers the first assertion on x86_64, which means that the
compiler is unable to evaluate it to a compile-time initializer
when the architecture-specific bitop is used even if it's obvious.
In order to let the compiler optimize out such cases, expand the
bitop() macro to use the "constant" C non-atomic bitop
implementations when all of the arguments passed are compile-time
constants, which means that the result will be a compile-time
constant as well, so that it produces more efficient and simple
code in 100% cases, comparing to the architecture-specific
counterparts.
The savings are architecture, compiler and compiler flags dependent,
for example, on x86_64 -O2:
GCC 12: add/remove: 78/29 grow/shrink: 332/525 up/down: 31325/-61560 (-30235)
LLVM 13: add/remove: 79/76 grow/shrink: 184/537 up/down: 55076/-141892 (-86816)
LLVM 14: add/remove: 10/3 grow/shrink: 93/138 up/down: 3705/-6992 (-3287)
and ARM64 (courtesy of Mark):
GCC 11: add/remove: 92/29 grow/shrink: 933/2766 up/down: 39340/-82580 (-43240)
LLVM 14: add/remove: 21/11 grow/shrink: 620/651 up/down: 12060/-15824 (-3764)
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
include/linux/bitops.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
index 3c3afbae1533..cf9bf65039f2 100644
--- a/include/linux/bitops.h
+++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
@@ -33,8 +33,24 @@ extern unsigned long __sw_hweight64(__u64 w);
#include <asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h>
+/*
+ * Many architecture-specific non-atomic bitops contain inline asm code and due
+ * to that the compiler can't optimize them to compile-time expressions or
+ * constants. In contrary, generic_*() helpers are defined in pure C and
+ * compilers optimize them just well.
+ * Therefore, to make `unsigned long foo = 0; __set_bit(BAR, &foo)` effectively
+ * equal to `unsigned long foo = BIT(BAR)`, pick the generic C alternative when
+ * the arguments can be resolved at compile time. That expression itself is a
+ * constant and doesn't bring any functional changes to the rest of cases.
+ * The casts to `uintptr_t` are needed to mitigate `-Waddress` warnings when
+ * passing a bitmap from .bss or .data (-> `!!addr` is always true).
+ */
#define bitop(op, nr, addr) \
- op(nr, addr)
+ ((__builtin_constant_p(nr) && \
+ __builtin_constant_p((uintptr_t)(addr) != (uintptr_t)NULL) && \
+ (uintptr_t)(addr) != (uintptr_t)NULL && \
+ __builtin_constant_p(*(const unsigned long *)(addr))) ? \
+ const##op(nr, addr) : op(nr, addr))
#define __set_bit(nr, addr) bitop(___set_bit, nr, addr)
#define __clear_bit(nr, addr) bitop(___clear_bit, nr, addr)
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-24 12:13 [PATCH v5 0/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] ia64, processor: fix -Wincompatible-pointer-types in ia64_get_irr() Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] bitops: always define asm-generic non-atomic bitops Alexander Lobakin
2023-01-02 16:14 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-01-02 16:30 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-01-02 17:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] bitops: unify non-atomic bitops prototypes across architectures Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-06 10:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] bitops: define const_*() versions of the non-atomics Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] bitops: wrap non-atomic bitops with a transparent macro Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2022-07-15 0:04 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Guenter Roeck
2022-07-15 13:26 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-15 13:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-15 14:19 ` Yury Norov
2022-07-15 14:50 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] net/ice: fix initializing the bitmap in the switch code Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] bitmap: don't assume compiler evaluates small mem*() builtins calls Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] lib: test_bitmap: add compile-time optimization/evaluations assertions Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:51 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Borislav Petkov
2022-06-30 16:56 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-01 2:58 ` Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220624121313.2382500-7-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
--to=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bcain@quicinc.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox