From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/17] mm: introduce numa_memblks
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:13:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240716111346.3676969-1-rppt@kernel.org> (raw)
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Hi,
Following the discussion about handling of CXL fixed memory windows on
arm64 [1] I decided to bite the bullet and move numa_memblks from x86 to
the generic code so they will be available on arm64/riscv and maybe on
loongarch sometime later.
While it could be possible to use memblock to describe CXL memory windows,
it currently lacks notion of unpopulated memory ranges and numa_memblks
does implement this.
Another reason to make numa_memblks generic is that both arch_numa (arm64
and riscv) and loongarch use trimmed copy of x86 code although there is no
fundamental reason why the same code cannot be used on all these platforms.
Having numa_memblks in mm/ will make it's interaction with ACPI and FDT
more consistent and I believe will reduce maintenance burden.
And with generic numa_memblks it is (almost) straightforward to enable NUMA
emulation on arm64 and riscv.
The first 5 commits in this series are cleanups that are not strictly
related to numa_memblks.
Commits 6-11 slightly reorder code in x86 to allow extracting numa_memblks
and NUMA emulation to the generic code.
Commits 12-14 actually move the code from arch/x86/ to mm/ and commit 15
does some aftermath cleanups.
Commit 16 switches arch_numa to numa_memblks.
Commit 17 enables usage of phys_to_target_node() and
memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() with numa_memblks.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240529171236.32002-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/
Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) (17):
mm: move kernel/numa.c to mm/
MIPS: sgi-ip27: make NODE_DATA() the same as on all other
architectures
MIPS: loongson64: rename __node_data to node_data
arch, mm: move definition of node_data to generic code
arch, mm: pull out allocation of NODE_DATA to generic code
x86/numa: simplify numa_distance allocation
x86/numa: move FAKE_NODE_* defines to numa_emu
x86/numa_emu: simplify allocation of phys_dist
x86/numa_emu: split __apicid_to_node update to a helper function
x86/numa_emu: use a helper function to get MAX_DMA32_PFN
x86/numa: numa_{add,remove}_cpu: make cpu parameter unsigned
mm: introduce numa_memblks
mm: move numa_distance and related code from x86 to numa_memblks
mm: introduce numa_emulation
mm: make numa_memblks more self-contained
arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks
mm: make range-to-target_node lookup facility a part of numa_memblks
arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h | 13 -
arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 1 +
arch/loongarch/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
arch/loongarch/include/asm/mmzone.h | 16 -
arch/loongarch/include/asm/topology.h | 1 +
arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c | 21 -
arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h | 1 -
.../mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/mmzone.h | 4 -
arch/mips/loongson64/numa.c | 20 +-
arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmzone.h | 6 -
arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 26 +-
arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h | 13 -
arch/riscv/include/asm/topology.h | 4 +
arch/s390/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
arch/s390/include/asm/mmzone.h | 17 -
arch/s390/kernel/numa.c | 3 -
arch/sh/include/asm/mmzone.h | 3 -
arch/sh/mm/init.c | 7 +-
arch/sh/mm/numa.c | 3 -
arch/sparc/include/asm/mmzone.h | 4 -
arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 11 +-
arch/x86/Kconfig | 9 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone.h | 6 -
arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h | 17 -
arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_64.h | 18 -
arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h | 24 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 9 -
arch/x86/mm/Makefile | 1 -
arch/x86/mm/amdtopology.c | 1 +
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 618 +-----------------
arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h | 24 -
drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 1 +
drivers/base/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 223 ++-----
drivers/cxl/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/dax/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/of/of_numa.c | 1 +
include/asm-generic/mmzone.h | 5 +
include/asm-generic/numa.h | 6 +-
include/linux/numa.h | 5 +
include/linux/numa_memblks.h | 58 ++
kernel/Makefile | 1 -
kernel/numa.c | 26 -
mm/Kconfig | 11 +
mm/Makefile | 3 +
mm/numa.c | 57 ++
{arch/x86/mm => mm}/numa_emulation.c | 42 +-
mm/numa_memblks.c | 565 ++++++++++++++++
52 files changed, 847 insertions(+), 1070 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
delete mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/mmzone.h
delete mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
delete mode 100644 arch/s390/include/asm/mmzone.h
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone.h
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_64.h
create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/mmzone.h
create mode 100644 include/linux/numa_memblks.h
delete mode 100644 kernel/numa.c
create mode 100644 mm/numa.c
rename {arch/x86/mm => mm}/numa_emulation.c (94%)
create mode 100644 mm/numa_memblks.c
base-commit: 22a40d14b572deb80c0648557f4bd502d7e83826
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-16 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-16 11:13 Mike Rapoport [this message]
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 01/17] mm: move kernel/numa.c to mm/ Mike Rapoport
2024-07-17 14:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 13:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 02/17] MIPS: sgi-ip27: make NODE_DATA() the same as on all other architectures Mike Rapoport
2024-07-17 14:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 14:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22 7:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 03/17] MIPS: loongson64: rename __node_data to node_data Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 13:07 ` Jiaxun Yang
2024-07-17 14:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 15:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 04/17] arch, mm: move definition of node_data to generic code Mike Rapoport
2024-07-17 14:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 15:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-23 0:15 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 05/17] arch, mm: pull out allocation of NODE_DATA " Mike Rapoport
2024-07-17 14:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-18 7:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 15:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 15:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 15:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 15:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-19 16:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-20 10:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 06/17] x86/numa: simplify numa_distance allocation Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22 7:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 07/17] x86/numa: move FAKE_NODE_* defines to numa_emu Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 08/17] x86/numa_emu: simplify allocation of phys_dist Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 09/17] x86/numa_emu: split __apicid_to_node update to a helper function Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 10/17] x86/numa_emu: use a helper function to get MAX_DMA32_PFN Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 11/17] x86/numa: numa_{add,remove}_cpu: make cpu parameter unsigned Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 12/17] mm: introduce numa_memblks Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 18:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22 8:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 13/17] mm: move numa_distance and related code from x86 to numa_memblks Mike Rapoport
2024-07-18 21:46 ` Samuel Holland
2024-07-19 5:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 17:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-20 12:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 14/17] mm: introduce numa_emulation Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:03 ` Zi Yan
2024-07-20 12:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 15/17] mm: make numa_memblks more self-contained Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 18:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-20 12:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-22 8:05 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 16/17] arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 18:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 17/17] mm: make range-to-target_node lookup facility a part of numa_memblks Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 18:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 00/17] mm: introduce numa_memblks Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22 8:08 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240716111346.3676969-1-rppt@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).