From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] clk: shmobile: add CPG driver for rz-platforms
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:02:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2207635.bd10VfTU6U@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140303162731.GA3732@katana>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1476 bytes --]
Hi Wolfram,
On Monday 03 March 2014 17:27:31 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > While the parent is indeed selected at boot time only, and only one parent
> > is thus needed, parent selection could be performed by a DIP switch
> > connected to MD_CLK on the board for instance. In that case both parents
> > should be available in DT, as selection will be done by the kernel at
> > boot time, not at DT compile time.
>
> OK, I understand the case. I still wonder about specifying two parents,
> though. If a board uses USB_X1, it then has to spefify a dummy EXTAL
> clock (or an empty one), just because USB_X1 is enumerated as second
> entry?
That's a good question. Mike, would it be possible to support "holes" in the
DT clocks lists, like the GPIO DT bindings do ?
> > > Again, now that I already coded it, what is the gain to remove it? The
> > > drawback is that other people might get encouraged to find reasons to
> > > allow them sloppy practices.
> >
> > It will make the kernel binary smaller by removing code that is not needed
> > in practice.
>
> Sounds like a micro-optimazation to me. If you insist, we should BUG()
> right away in that case, to make the code comprehensible. Returning with
> a leak and saying "we will probably fail somewhere" should really be
> avoided IMO.
It's a micro-optimization indeed, but a simple one, so I believe it makes
sense. I'll leave it up to you in the end.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-04 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-28 21:09 [PATCH 0/4] CCF support for Renesas r7s72100 Wolfram Sang
2014-02-28 21:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: r7s72100: add clock nodes to dtsi Wolfram Sang
2014-02-28 21:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: r7s72100: genmai: populate extal clock node Wolfram Sang
2014-02-28 21:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] clk: shmobile: add CPG driver for rz-platforms Wolfram Sang
2014-03-02 22:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-03 9:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-03 10:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-03 16:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-04 11:02 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2014-03-04 11:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-04 11:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-04 11:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-05 13:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-05 13:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-05 15:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-02-28 21:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: use workaround for non DT-clocks Wolfram Sang
2014-03-02 22:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-03 9:22 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-03 10:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2207635.bd10VfTU6U@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).