SUPERH platform development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stable boot: 93 boots: 92 pass, 1 fail (v3.17.6)
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:39:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2389005.vUt7gzqoxX@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2553650.3KSUKtTdo3@wuerfel>

On Monday 08 December 2014 14:48:20 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 December 2014 21:49:05 Kevin's boot bot wrote:
> >> Full Build report: http://status.armcloud.us/build/stable/kernel/v3.17.6/
> >> Full Boot report:  http://status.armcloud.us/boot/all/job/stable/kernel/v3.17.6/
> >>
> >> Tree/Branch: stable
> >> Git describe: v3.17.6
> >>
> >> Failed boot tests
> >> ========> >>                      emev2-kzm9d:     FAIL:    arm-shmobile_defconfig
> >>                                       http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/stable/v3.17.6/arm-shmobile_defconfig/boot-emev2-kzm9d.html
> >>
> >
> > I tried to look at the reports, but the links don't work. Going
> > back in the archive, I see that it was still working until v3.17.2,
> > broken in v3.17.4/.5/.6 and the boot report for v3.17.3 seemed to run
> > into an unrelated issue. Mainline was always fine since 3.17, only
> > the stable kernels had problems:
> >
> > http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/stable/v3.17.2/arm-shmobile_defconfig/boot-emev2-kzm9d.html
> > http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/stable/v3.17.3/arm-shmobile_defconfig/boot-emev2-kzm9d.html
> > http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/stable/v3.17.4/arm-shmobile_defconfig/boot-emev2-kzm9d.html
> >
> > It may be worth having the sh team investigate the problem some more,
> > to see if a bad patch made it into stable kernels.
> 
> Thanks for telling us!
> 
> I don't have a kzm9d, so I'm just guessing based on the evidence.
> 
> 1. When comparing successful v3.1.72 with failed v3.17.4, I see:
> 
>  Sending DHCP requests ., OK
> -IP-Config: Got DHCP answer from 192.168.1.3, my address is 192.168.1.189
> +IP-Config: Got DHCP answer from 192.168.1.254, my address is 192.168.1.188
>  IP-Config: Complete:
> -     device=eth0, hwaddr\0:01:9b:04:03:cd, ipaddr\x192.168.1.189,
> mask%5.255.255.0, gw\x192.168.1.254
> -     host=kzm9d, domain=lan, nis-domain=(none)
> -     bootserver\x192.168.1.2, rootserver\x192.168.1.2,
> rootpath=/opt/kjh/rootfs/debian/armel,rsize@96,wsize@96
> -     nameserver0\x192.168.1.254, nameserver1f.93.87.2,
> nameserver2!6.231.41.2
> +     device=eth0, hwaddr\0:01:9b:04:03:cd, ipaddr\x192.168.1.188,
> mask%5.255.255.0, gw\x192.168.1.254
> +     host\x192.168.1.188, domain=lan, nis-domain=(none)
> +     bootserver\x192.168.1.254, rootserver\x192.168.1.254, rootpath> +     nameserver0\x192.168.1.254
>  ALSA device list:
>    No soundcards found.
> 
> So both the client and server IP addresses have changed. Is there a proper NFS
> root file system available? Mounting of NFS root will time out, but the boot
> farm management software may time out earlier, so we don't get to see the
> panic message?

The 3.18-rc7 boot got these:

IP-Config: Got DHCP answer from 192.168.1.254, my address is 192.168.1.185
IP-Config: Complete:
     device=eth0, hwaddr\0:01:9b:04:03:cd, ipaddr\x192.168.1.185, mask%5.255.255.0, gw\x192.168.1.254
     host\x192.168.1.185, domain=lan, nis-domain=(none)
     bootserver\x192.168.1.254, rootserver\x192.168.1.254, rootpath     nameserver0\x192.168.1.254

So it's the same server as the failing config, and yet another client
address. I'd say it's unlikely to be related.

> Could this be a configuration issue?
> Do you have more logs, e.g. from successful v3.18-rc* builds??


http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/kernel-build-reports/2014-November/author.html
has all the build reports from November, and you can navigate the archives
to find other months.

See 
http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/mainline/v3.18-rc7/arm-shmobile_defconfig/boot-emev2-kzm9d.txt

for another example of a successful log, or navigate the directories on
that server for others.

> 2. v3.17.4 has
> 
> commit a54857a74cf6724a872217477fa5827d6b9d26c8
> Author: Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@iseebcn.com>
> Date:   Thu Nov 13 09:14:34 2014 +0100
> 
>     smsc911x: power-up phydev before doing a software reset.
> 
>     [ Upstream commit ccf899a27c08038db91765ff12bb0380dcd85887 ]
> 
> Seems unlikely the above is the culprit, but please note that upstream does have
> a few more fixes in this area:
> 
> 6ff53fd37175e35d net/smsc911x: Fix delays in the PHY enable/disable routines
> 242bcd5ba1dcea80 net/smsc911x: Fix rare soft reset timeout issue due
> to PHY power-down mode

If you think it helps, we could try reverting this commit and have the
boot farm try the latest 3.17.6 without this patch.

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-08 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-08 11:35 stable boot: 93 boots: 92 pass, 1 fail (v3.17.6) Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 13:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-08 15:39 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-12-08 16:23 ` Tyler Baker
2014-12-08 16:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-08 17:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-08 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-08 17:35 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-09  0:27 ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2389005.vUt7gzqoxX@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox