From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 06:32:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/03] ARM: shmobile: r8a7779 Marzen legacy removal Message-Id: <2509734.cmn6CZOzu1@avalon> List-Id: References: <20150716075342.1198.63257.sendpatchset@little-apple> In-Reply-To: <20150716075342.1198.63257.sendpatchset@little-apple> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Friday 17 July 2015 13:04:57 Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:53:42PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > > ARM: shmobile: r8a7779 Marzen legacy removal > > > > [PATCH 01/03] ARM: shmobile: marzen: Remove legacy board code > > [PATCH 02/03] ARM: shmobile: r8a7779: Remove legacy SoC code > > [PATCH 03/03] ARM: shmobile: Remove marzen_defconfig > > > > This series removes the r8a7779 Marzen legacy code. Board > > code for Marzen written in C and r8a7779 SoC code including > > old clock framework code and platform devices are removed. > > > > Existing Marzen users need to move over to Multiplatform and > > shmobile_defconfig. The DT file r8a7779-marzen.dts file is > > the same as for the legacy case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm > > Thanks, I have queued these up. > > FYI doing so was rather awkward as patch 01 and especially patch 02 > have various conflicts with patches in several different branches. > > For now I have gone with queuing them up on top of the marzen-reference > removal patches, which leaves minor conflicts mainly in Kconfig and > Makefiles. There is also a conflict with the marzen board code fix you > recently posted which is present in a separate fixes branch. I wonder if it > would make sense to drop that patch now removal of the code it fixes is > queued up. I see little point in keeping it beyond pushing our commit statistics, which shouldn't be the motivating factor :-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart