From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sh-pfc: r8a7778: add SDHI support
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:55:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2670717.Wu1rs5SFVS@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ehe9enys.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Hi Morimoto-san,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday 16 April 2013 22:16:30 Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7778.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7778.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7778.c index ddbd27b..7c22d33 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7778.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7778.c
> @@ -1417,6 +1417,63 @@ SCIF_PFC_DAT(scif5_data_a, TX5_A,
RX5_A);
> SCIF_PFC_PIN(scif5_data_b, RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 15), RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 14));
> SCIF_PFC_DAT(scif5_data_b, TX5_B, RX5_B);
>
> +/* - SDHI macro
> ------------------------------------------------------------- */ +#define
> SDHI_PFC(name, pclk, pcmd, pdat0, pdat1, pdat2, pdat3, pcd, pwp,\ +
> mclk, mcmd, mdat0, mdat1, mdat2, mdat3, mcd, mwp)\
> + static const unsigned int name ##_pins[] = \
> + { pclk, pcmd, pdat0, pdat1, pdat2, pdat3, pcd, pwp }; \
> + static const unsigned int name ##_mux[] = \
> + { mclk##_MARK, mcmd##_MARK, mdat0##_MARK, mdat1##_MARK, \
> + mdat2##_MARK, mdat3##_MARK, mcd##_MARK, mwp##_MARK }
> +
> +/* - SDHI0
> ------------------------------------------------------------------ */
> +SDHI_PFC(sdhi0, RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 11), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 12),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 13), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 14),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 15), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 16),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 17), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 18),
> + SD0_CLK, SD0_CMD,
> + SD0_DAT0, SD0_DAT1,
> + SD0_DAT2, SD0_DAT3,
> + SD0_CD, SD0_WP);
Unlike for SCIF, I actually think the macro hinders readability here compared
to the raw arrays. That's a personal opinion, you can keep the macro if you
prefer.
> +/* - SDHI1
> ------------------------------------------------------------------ */
> +SDHI_PFC(sdhi1_a, RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 5), RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 6),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 7), RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 8),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(0, 5), RCAR_GP_PIN(0, 6),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(0, 30), RCAR_GP_PIN(0, 31),
> + SD1_CLK_A, SD1_CMD_A,
> + SD1_DAT0_A, SD1_DAT1_A,
> + SD1_DAT2_A, SD1_DAT3_A,
> + SD1_CD_A, SD1_WP_A);
> +
> +SDHI_PFC(sdhi1_b, RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 17), RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 16),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 18), RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 19),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 20), RCAR_GP_PIN(1, 21),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(2, 24), RCAR_GP_PIN(2, 25),
> + SD1_CLK_B, SD1_CMD_B,
> + SD1_DAT0_B, SD1_DAT1_B,
> + SD1_DAT2_B, SD1_DAT3_B,
> + SD1_CD_B, SD1_WP_B);
> +
> +/* - SDH2
> ------------------------------------------------------------------- */
> +SDHI_PFC(sdhi2_a, RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 17), RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 18),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 19), RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 20),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 21), RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 22),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 23), RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 24),
> + SD2_CLK_A, SD2_CMD_A,
> + SD2_DAT0_A, SD2_DAT1_A,
> + SD2_DAT2_A, SD2_DAT3_A,
> + SD2_CD_A, SD2_WP_A);
> +
> +SDHI_PFC(sdhi2_b, RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 5), RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 6),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 7), RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 8),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 25), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 26),
> + RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 27), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 28),
> + SD2_CLK_B, SD2_CMD_B,
> + SD2_DAT0_B, SD2_DAT1_B,
> + SD2_DAT2_B, SD2_DAT3_B,
> + SD2_CD_B, SD2_WP_B);
> +
> static const struct sh_pfc_pin_group pinmux_groups[] = {
> SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(hscif0_data_a),
> SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(hscif0_data_b),
> @@ -1461,6 +1518,11 @@ static const struct sh_pfc_pin_group pinmux_groups[]
> = { SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(scif4_data_c),
> SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(scif5_data_a),
> SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(scif5_data_b),
> + SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(sdhi0),
> + SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(sdhi1_a),
> + SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(sdhi1_b),
> + SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(sdhi2_a),
> + SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(sdhi2_b),
> };
>
> static const char * const hscif0_groups[] = {
> @@ -1533,6 +1595,20 @@ static const char * const scif5_groups[] = {
> "scif5_data_b",
> };
>
> +static const char * const sdhi0_groups[] = {
> + "sdhi0",
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const sdhi1_groups[] = {
> + "sdhi1_a",
> + "sdhi1_b",
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const sdhi2_groups[] = {
> + "sdhi2_a",
> + "sdhi2_b",
> +};
> +
> static const struct sh_pfc_function pinmux_functions[] = {
> SH_PFC_FUNCTION(hscif0),
> SH_PFC_FUNCTION(hscif1),
> @@ -1543,6 +1619,9 @@ static const struct sh_pfc_function pinmux_functions[]
> = { SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif3),
> SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif4),
> SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif5),
> + SH_PFC_FUNCTION(sdhi0),
> + SH_PFC_FUNCTION(sdhi1),
> + SH_PFC_FUNCTION(sdhi2),
> };
>
> static struct pinmux_cfg_reg pinmux_config_regs[] = {
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-17 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-17 5:16 [PATCH 1/6] sh-pfc: r8a7778: add SDHI support Kuninori Morimoto
2013-04-17 8:55 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-04-18 0:27 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-04-18 2:02 ` Kuninori Morimoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2670717.Wu1rs5SFVS@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).