From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>,
Yoshifumi Hosoya <yoshifumi.hosoya.wj@renesas.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] v4l: vsp1: Change VSP1 LIF linebuffer FIFO
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:23:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35670369.0N4n9OXz2m@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVKmWgcSqLxfgOUFXd2mu-dacvQxLJr7xLaQ=S8Mt0gnw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Monday 16 March 2015 09:06:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
> > From: Yoshifumi Hosoya <yoshifumi.hosoya.wj@renesas.com>
> >
> > Change to VSPD hardware recommended value.
> > Purpose is highest pixel clock without underruns.
> > In the default R-Car Linux BSP config this value is
> > wrong and therefore there are many underruns.
> >
> > Here are the original settings:
> > HBTH = 1300 (VSPD stops when 1300 pixels are buffered)
> > LBTH = 200 (VSPD resumes when buffer level has decreased
> > below 200 pixels)
> >
> > The display underruns can be eliminated
> > by applying the following settings:
> > HBTH = 1504
> > LBTH = 1248
> >
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_lif.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_lif.c
> > @@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ static int lif_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *subdev, int
> > enable)
> > {
> > const struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *format;
> > struct vsp1_lif *lif = to_lif(subdev);
> > - unsigned int hbth = 1300;
> > - unsigned int obth = 400;
> > - unsigned int lbth = 200;
> > + unsigned int hbth = 1536;
> > + unsigned int obth = 128;
> > + unsigned int lbth = 1520;
>
> These values don't match the patch description?
Indeed. And where do these values come from ? A 16 bytes hysteresis is very
small, the VSP1 will constantly start and stop. Isn't that bad from a power
consumption point of view ?
> BTW, what's the significance of changing obth?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-15 14:33 [PATCH/RFC] v4l: vsp1: Change VSP1 LIF linebuffer FIFO Yoshihiro Kaneko
2015-03-16 8:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-03-18 13:23 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2015-03-29 13:12 ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35670369.0N4n9OXz2m@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=ykaneko0929@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshifumi.hosoya.wj@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).