From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/81] SH pin control and GPIO rework
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:33:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3937593.RWUOL6AydO@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130107030310.GA14865@verge.net.au>
Hi Simon,
On Monday 07 January 2013 12:03:10 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 05:40:47PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 December 2012 09:12:02 Simon Horman wrote:
> > > [ CC: linux-arm-kernel, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann ]
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:53:42PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > Hi everybody,
> > > >
> > > > Here's the fourth version of the SH pin control and GPIO rework
> > > > patches. The patches have been rebased on top of v3.8-rc1 but are
> > > > otherwise unchanged.
> > > >
> > > > The series starts with the same additional platform-specific fixes as
> > > > v3 (patches 4 to 7), I would appreciate if someone could review them
> > > > carefully.
> > > >
> > > > You can get the series from my git tree at
> > > >
> > > > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git pinmux
> > > >
> > > > I would like to push this set to v3.9 independently of the later
> > > > rework and OF-related sets. Simon, can you take it in your tree ?
> > >
> > > Sure.
> > >
> > > One inconvenience of my tree is that it goes via the arm-soc tree and as
> > > such things need to be split out into branches. I believe in the case of
> > > this series the patches will need to be split across soc, board and pfc
> > > branches. The branches may be based on each other.
> > >
> > > Do you think the following scheme might work:
> > >
> > > Patches 1 - 7: sh-soc
> > > Patches 8 - 21: pfc, based on sh-soc
> > > Patches 22 - 29: soc (ARM SoC), based on pfc
> > > Patches 30 - 42: sh-soc2, based on pfc
> > > Patches 43 - 50: pfc2, based on a merge of soc and sh-soc2
> > > Patches 51 - 54: soc2 (ARM SoC), based on pfc2
> > > Patches 55 - 66: pfc3, based on soc2
> > > Patches 67 - 78: sh-soc3, based on pfc3
> > > Patches 79 - 81: pfc4, based on sh-soc3
> >
> > That looks good to me. Alternatively you could base pfc3 on top of a merge
> > of soc and sh-soc2, and base pfc4 on top of a merge of soc2 and sh-soc3,
> > but you might get conflicts in Kconfig and Makefile (they should be
> > trivial to solve though).
>
> Thanks, I have used the modified scheme that you describe above and all
> seems well. In detail, I have done the following:
>
> Patches 1 - 7: sh-soc based on v3.8-rc1
> Patches 8 - 21: pfc, based on sh-soc
> Patches 22 - 29: soc (ARM SoC), based on pfc
> Patches 30 - 42: sh-soc2, based on pfc
> Patches 43 - 50 and 55 - 66: pfc2, based on a merge of soc and sh-soc2
> Patches 51 - 54: soc2 (ARM SoC), based on pfc2
> Patches 67 - 78: sh-soc3, based on pfc2
> Patches 79 - 81: pfc4, based on a merge of soc2 and sh-soc-3
>
> Assuming that nothing nasty crops I plan to push the result to
> the renesas tree later today.
Thank you.
Linus acked the next patch series but there are still two issues I need to
solve. I'll repost the patches and send a pull request in the near future.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-07 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-28 22:53 [PATCH v4 00/81] SH pin control and GPIO rework Laurent Pinchart
2012-12-30 0:12 ` Simon Horman
2013-01-03 16:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-01-07 3:03 ` Simon Horman
2013-01-07 19:33 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-01-08 1:32 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3937593.RWUOL6AydO@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).