From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:34:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/27] sh-pfc: Support pins with no associated GPIO port Message-Id: <4664220.bfjJW75nMR@avalon> List-Id: References: <1373933479-17727-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> In-Reply-To: <1373933479-17727-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Monday 29 July 2013 16:32:05 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Saturday 27 July 2013 01:14:10 Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> > On Sunday 21 July 2013 00:19:36 Linus Walleij wrote: > >> >> That's very helpful, I can then pull it in and inspect the files > >> >> before and after this train of patches, which is probably the most > >> >> efficient way to review it. > >> > > >> > The patches can be found in my git tree at > >> > > >> > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git pinmux/next/pin-no-gpio > >> > > >> > If you have time, could you already review them ? > >> > >> I'd like to pull this into the pinctrl tree but then I'd prefer if they > >> were based on v3.11-rc1 if possible? > > > > Sure. I've rebased > > > > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git pinmux/next/pin-no-gpio > > > > on top of v3.11-rc1. > > Bah I got confused by the other pull request. > > I have pulled *this* series and pushed for-next. No worries. Feel free to pull the other one as well ;-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart