From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:29:28 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: sh_tmu: Set cpu_possible_mask to fix SMP broadcast
Message-Id: <4884130.U1r5Ds8DlI@avalon>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20141216094854.22639.69181.sendpatchset@w520>
In-Reply-To: <20141216094854.22639.69181.sendpatchset@w520>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org

Hi Magnus,

On Thursday 18 December 2014 00:46:59 Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 December 2014 14:59:21 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> >>> What are we missing ?
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> - The DIV6 multiparent series has been merged by Mike, and the sh73a0
> >> >>> CCF is nearly ready.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Yep.
> >> >> 
> >> >>> - We need proper BSC support to get LAN working, although it could be
> >> >>> worked around temporarily by specifying the BSC clock in the LAN node
> >> >>> if I recall correctly.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Working on that. I hope to send out v2 later today...
> >> >> 
> >> >>> - Accelerometer and RTC have no DT bindings, but they should work
> >> >>> with the I2C core OF match support.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I have RTC in my DTS, and it works.
> >> > 
> >> > Great.
> >> > 
> >> > I can help with at least some of the remaining pieces if you share your
> >> > working branch.
> >> 
> >> I pushed my local working branch to
> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git/lo
> >> g/? h=wip
> >> 
> >> Please wear sun glasses, and keep the kbuild test robot away ;-)
> > 
> > I will :-) Thank you. Is there a way to selectively keep kbuild away from
> > branches by the way ?
> > 
> > Do avoid duplicating work, what do you plan to work on in the context of
> > multiplatform kzm9g ?
> > 
> > Magnus, how much time do you think would be worth spending on DT support
> > for the lcdc drm driver ?
> 
> Not much, but perhaps it is good to have a working separate reference
> implementation if it can be done with little effort.
> 
> I guess if you can re-use the LCDC driver between sh73a0 and r8a7740
> then there may be _some_ point,

The driver should be usable on both platforms, yes.

> but unless I'm mistaken the sh73a0 has the LCDC interrupt only routed to
> INTCS which in turn lacks DT support.

You're correct :-( It shouldn't be difficult to implement a proper INTCS 
irqchip driver. As usual, it's a matter of time. I'm afraid I won't be able to 
tackle that in the very near future.

> Not sure if r8a7740 is any better - at least it has the GIC together with
> the Cortex-A9.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart