Re: On "sh: Consolidate SH-Mobile CPU code in arch/sh/kernel/cpu/shmobile/."

[Francesco VIRLINZI <francesco.virlinzi@st.com>]

Hi Paul, Magnus
>>     
> While I don't have any real objections against the interpreter idea, this
> is something you and Magnus will have to sort out. My expectation is that
> this is something that will be gradually implemented and changed over
> time, and we can certainly move code around whenever there is a need. For
> now there are no non-shmobile parts that can use this code, so this is
> the best place for it.
>
> As we move to a more generic implementation, the SH-Mobile bits will
> likely be simplified quite a bit, but the extra abstraction still makes
> sense, as it is a common characteristic for this family of parts.
>   
What do you think if we begin with a collection of all the shared 
requirement/constraint
 and after that we write on top of that the code required?

Regards
 Francesco