From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carmelo AMOROSO Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:43:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stackprotector: add stack smashing protector Message-Id: <4D25D515.9060202@st.com> List-Id: References: <1293111851-7175-1-git-send-email-filippo.arcidiacono@st.com> <4D245D16.5010702@st.com> <20110106093940.GA31708@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4D25CEB9.7090205@st.com> <20110106141946.GE31708@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110106141946.GE31708@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/6/2011 3:19 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > > Well, SH (in CC) does not have this support. Indeed we posted it > > initially to linux-sh only. We got useful feedback from Paul, Mike and > > Nicolas suggesting to promote the ARM/SH solution based on the global > > __stack_chk_guard variable as a generic solution for all other > > architectures. This is why I thought to post to the LKML instead of each > > linux- list. > > Have you thought about posting it to _the_ linux-arch list? > I did not know this list. I'll do. Thanks. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0l1RUACgkQoRq/3BrK1s8a1gCgpSdHez/S8cJ8BM5jVhYH0TKy 84gAnRkeALaLGMoXJqtxdDRL7Xusc6JT =L6Oj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----