linux-sh.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] sh-pfc: r8a7778: add common PFC macro helper
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:33:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <517AC861.1060808@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8738un6wwd.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>

Hello.

On 04/19/2013 07:07 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

> pfc-r8a7778 will have many devices pfc support in the future,
> and current pfc-r8a7778 is using pin/mux definition macro for SCIF.
> The device definition style using macro is readable code IMO,
> but creating new macro for each devices is not good sense.
> This patch adds common SH_PFC_xx() macro for each new feature devices
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3
>
>   - new patch
>
>   drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7778.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7778.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7778.c
> index ddbd27b..139f9dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7778.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7778.c
> @@ -1303,15 +1303,25 @@ static struct sh_pfc_pin pinmux_pins[] = {
>    */
>   #define PIN_NUMBER(row, col)		(1000+((row)-1)*25+(col)-1)
>   
> -/* - SCIF macro ------------------------------------------------------------- */
> -#define SCIF_PFC_PIN(name, args...)					\
> +/* - macro */
> +#define SH_PFC_PINS(name, args...) \
>   	static const unsigned int name ##_pins[] = { args }
> -#define SCIF_PFC_DAT(name, tx, rx)					\
> -	static const unsigned int name ##_mux[]  = { tx##_MARK, rx##_MARK, }
> -#define SCIF_PFC_CTR(name, cts, rts)					\
> -	static const unsigned int name ##_mux[]  = { cts##_MARK, rts##_MARK, }
> -#define SCIF_PFC_CLK(name, sck)					\
> -	static const unsigned int name ##_mux[]  = { sck##_MARK, }
> +#define SH_PFC_MUX1(name, arg1)					\
> +	static const unsigned int name ##_mux[]  = { arg1##_MARK }
> +#define SH_PFC_MUX2(name, arg1, arg2)					\
> +	static const unsigned int name ##_mux[]  = { arg1##_MARK, arg2##_MARK, }
> +#define SH_PFC_MUX3(name, arg1, arg2, arg3)					\
> +	static const unsigned int name ##_mux[]  = { arg1##_MARK, arg2##_MARK,	\
> +						     arg3##_MARK }
> +#define SH_PFC_MUX4(name, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4)			\
> +	static const unsigned int name ##_mux[]  = { arg1##_MARK, arg2##_MARK, \
> +						     arg3##_MARK, arg4##_MARK }

     I think you should also have added SH_PFC_MUX8(). I'll add it today.

WBR, Sergei


      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-26 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-19  3:07 [PATCH 1/3 v3] sh-pfc: r8a7778: add common PFC macro helper Kuninori Morimoto
2013-04-22  5:24 ` Simon Horman
2013-04-22 10:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-04-23  0:32 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-04-26 18:33 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=517AC861.1060808@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).