From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:18:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v2] ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: cleanup registration of hspi
Message-Id: <51F27743.1010005@cogentembedded.com>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <87zjt9bwp7.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
In-Reply-To: <87zjt9bwp7.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org

Hello.

On 26-07-2013 11:35, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

> sh-hspi driver which doesn't need platform data at the time of
> registration can be registerd on SoC.

    I repeat my question about the pinmux settings.

> And, registering these drivers in the SoC code can avoid
> unwanted device numbering issue.
> (ex. the hspi2 device number will be spi.0 if hspi2 only registered)

    This IMHO is a non-issue.

> This patch registers it on SoC code as cleanup C code

    Why not call the patch ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: register HSPI in SoC code" 
then?

> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>

WBR, Sergei