linux-sh.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, mkl@pengutronix.de,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, vksavl@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: add Renesas R-Car CAN driver
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:45:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5282A17C.1030309@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <527D89A3.1070403@cogentembedded.com>

Hello.

On 11/09/2013 04:02 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

>>>> 2. ... with short-circuited CAN high and low and doing some time later
>>>>          a manual recovery with "ip link set can0 type can restart"

>>>     Now we have auto recovery only. Manual recovery was tested with the
>>> first driver version and worked.

>> What do you mean with "auto recovery"? Auto recovery by the hardware or
>> via "restart-ms <ms>"? How do you choose between "manual" and "auto"
>> recovery?

>     This exact test was done with hardware auto-recovery only. No "restart-ms"
> was programmed.

>>> Terminal 1:

>>> root@10.0.0.104:/opt/can-utils# ./cangen -n 1 -g 1 can0
>>> root@10.0.0.104:/opt/can-utils# ./cangen -n 1 -g 1 can0
>>> root@10.0.0.104:/opt/can-utils# ./cangen -n 1 -g 1 can0
>>> root@10.0.0.104:/opt/can-utils#

>>> Terminal 2:

>>> root@10.0.0.104:/opt/can-utils# ./candump -td -e any,0:0,#FFFFFFFF
>>> (000.000000) can0 2000008C [8] 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 ERRORFRAME
>>> controller-problem{}
>>> protocol-violation{{tx-dominant-bit-error}{}}
>>> bus-error
>>> (000.021147) can0 20000144 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ERRORFRAME
>>> controller-problem{}
>>> bus-off
>>> restarted-after-bus-off

>> Why does it get "restarted" directly after the bus-off?

>     Because we have hardware auto-recovery enabled.

>>> (011.738522) can0 2000008C [8] 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 ERRORFRAME
>>> controller-problem{}

>> What controller problem? data[1] is not set for some reasom.

>     Not comments. Looking into it.

    Sorry, this has been fixed a while ago. Now the log looks like:

root@10.0.0.104:/opt/can-utils#  ./candump -td -e any,0:0,#FFFFFFFF
  (000.000000)  can0  2000008C   [8]  00 28 08 00 00 00 88 00 ERRORFRAME
         controller-problem{tx-error-warning,tx-error-passive}
         protocol-violation{{tx-dominant-bit-error}{}}
         bus-error
         error-counter-tx-rx{{136}{0}}
  (000.007578)  can0  20000040   [8]  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ERRORFRAME
         bus-off
  (000.091847)  can0  20000100   [8]  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ERRORFRAME
         restarted-after-bus-off
  (056.136722)  can0  2000008C   [8]  00 28 08 00 00 00 88 00 ERRORFRAME
         controller-problem{tx-error-warning,tx-error-passive}
         protocol-violation{{tx-dominant-bit-error}{}}
         bus-error
         error-counter-tx-rx{{136}{0}}

>>> dmesg:
>>> rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: Error warning interrupt
>>> rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: Error passive interrupt
>>> rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: Bus error interrupt:
>>> rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: Bit Error (dominant)
>>> rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: Error warning interrupt
>>> rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: Error passive interrupt

>> Why are they reported again. You are already in error passive.

>     Don't know. :-/

    This also has been dealt with. Here's an example:

rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: Bus error interrupt:
rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: ACK Error
rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: Error warning interrupt
rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: Bus error interrupt:
rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: ACK Error
rcar_can rcar_can.0 can0: Error passive interrupt

WBR, Sergei


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-12 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-27 22:11 [PATCH] can: add Renesas R-Car CAN driver Sergei Shtylyov
2013-09-28  0:40 ` Joe Perches
2013-09-28  0:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-09-28  0:52   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-09-29 19:03 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-10-17 21:54   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-10-02  6:09 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-10-17 22:16   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-10-21 19:12     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-11-09  0:02       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-11-09 10:53         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-11-09 14:47           ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-11-12 20:45         ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2013-11-12 22:17           ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-10-05 17:57 ` Wolfgang Grandegger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5282A17C.1030309@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vksavl@gmail.com \
    --cc=wg@grandegger.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).