From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valentine Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:40:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: soc_camera: rcar_vin: Add support for 10-bit YUV cameras Message-Id: <530C9D37.8070909@cogentembedded.com> List-Id: References: <1393256945-12781-1-git-send-email-phil.edworthy@renesas.com> <2516843.7QqJLHtUZT@avalon> In-Reply-To: <2516843.7QqJLHtUZT@avalon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Laurent Pinchart , Phil Edworthy Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Kuninori Morimoto , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Hans Verkuil , Guennadi Liakhovetski On 02/24/2014 10:38 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Monday 24 February 2014 15:49:05 Phil Edworthy wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy >> --- >> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c >> b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c index 3b1c05a..9929375 >> 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c >> @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ >> #define VNMC_YCAL (1 << 19) >> #define VNMC_INF_YUV8_BT656 (0 << 16) >> #define VNMC_INF_YUV8_BT601 (1 << 16) >> +#define VNMC_INF_YUV10_BT656 (2 << 16) >> +#define VNMC_INF_YUV10_BT601 (3 << 16) >> #define VNMC_INF_YUV16 (5 << 16) >> #define VNMC_VUP (1 << 10) >> #define VNMC_IM_ODD (0 << 3) >> @@ -275,6 +277,10 @@ static int rcar_vin_setup(struct rcar_vin_priv *priv) >> /* BT.656 8bit YCbCr422 or BT.601 8bit YCbCr422 */ >> vnmc |= priv->pdata->flags & RCAR_VIN_BT656 ? >> VNMC_INF_YUV8_BT656 : VNMC_INF_YUV8_BT601; > > Aren't you missing a break here ? > >> + case V4L2_MBUS_FMT_YUYV10_2X10: >> + /* BT.656 10bit YCbCr422 or BT.601 10bit YCbCr422 */ >> + vnmc |= priv->pdata->flags & RCAR_VIN_BT656 ? >> + VNMC_INF_YUV10_BT656 : VNMC_INF_YUV10_BT601; > > You should add one here as well. Although not strictly necessary, it would > help to avoid making the same mistake again. > > The rest looks good to me, but I'm not familiar with the hardware, so I'll let > Valentine have the last word. Thanks, looks good to me. > >> default: >> break; >> } >> @@ -1003,6 +1009,7 @@ static int rcar_vin_get_formats(struct >> soc_camera_device *icd, unsigned int idx, switch (code) { >> case V4L2_MBUS_FMT_YUYV8_1X16: >> case V4L2_MBUS_FMT_YUYV8_2X8: >> + case V4L2_MBUS_FMT_YUYV10_2X10: >> if (cam->extra_fmt) >> break; >