From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:52:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: add clock-indices support Message-Id: <5313B63C.7060802@codethink.co.uk> List-Id: References: <1392314571-30107-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1392314571-30107-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On 02/03/14 22:37, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Sunday 02 March 2014 22:28:09 Ben Dooks wrote: >> On 23/02/14 21:00, Mike Turquette wrote: >>> Quoting Ben Dooks (2014-02-13 10:02:49) >>> >>>> Add a property called clock-indices to allow clock-output-names >>>> to be used where the index used to lookup a clock is not a 1:1 >>>> mapping to the array position in the clock-output-names >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks >>> >>> Ben & Laurent, >>> >>> The clock-indices stuff looks sane to me. I've taken Ben's patch #1 into >>> clk-next. It seems patch #3 might be dropped and patch #2 didn't apply >>> cleanly for me. >>> >>> Can Laurent's patches and Ben's #2 be rebased and sent together as a PR? >>> I'll leave it up to you guys to figure out the backwards compatibility >>> issue with Ben's patch #3. >> >> Thanks, I've only just found this in my mailbox. >> Is there still any actions I need to take? > > I've sent a pull request for my patches only. Could you please rebase yours ? Ok, will go and see if I can find it. -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius