linux-sh.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Titiano <ptitiano@baylibre.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
Cc: magnus.damm@gmail.com, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com,
	eduardo.valentin@ti.com, bcousson@baylibre.com,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: minor fixes
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:45:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53173892.90001@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393858290.2193.28.camel@rzhang1-mobl4>



On 03/03/2014 15:51, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 15:52 -0800, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>> Here are 2 minor updates to the rcar-thermal driver.
>>>
>>> First patch removes an unecessary mask applied in a if statement.
>>> Because the same mask was already applied in the preceding statement,
>>> the second one can be removed.
>>>
>>> Second patch avoids updating the thermal zone in case an IRQ was triggered but
>>> the temperature didn't effectively change.
>>> Note this is not a driver issue.
>>> Below is a captured debug trace illustrating the purpose of this patch:
>>> out of 8 thermal zone updates, only 2 are actually necessary.
>>>
>>> [   41.120000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp%000
>>> [   41.120000] rcar_thermal_work(): new_ctemp0000
>>> [   41.120000] rcar_thermal_work(): temp is now 30000C, update thermal zone
>>> [   58.990000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
>>> [   58.990000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
>>> [   58.990000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
>>> [   59.290000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
>>> [   59.290000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
>>> [   59.290000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
>>> [   59.590000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
>>> [   59.590000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
>>> [   59.590000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
>>> [   59.890000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
>>> [   59.890000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
>>> [   59.890000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
>>> [   60.190000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
>>> [   60.190000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
>>> [   60.190000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
>>> [   60.490000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
>>> [   60.490000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp0000
>>> [   60.490000] rcar_thermal_work(): same temp, do not update thermal zone
>>> [   60.790000] rcar_thermal_work(): cctemp0000
>>> [   60.790000] rcar_thermal_work(): nctemp5000
>>> [   60.790000] rcar_thermal_work(): temp is now 35000C, update thermal zone
>>>
>>> I suspect this may be due to sensor sampling accuracy / fluctuation,
>>> but no formal proof.
>>>
>>> Patrick Titiano (2):
>>>   thermal: rcar-thermal: fix same mask applied twice
>>>   thermal: rcar-thermal: update thermal zone only when temperature
>>>     changes
>>>
>>>  drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c | 9 +++++++--
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> For all patches
>>
>> Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
>>
> applied.
> 
> thanks,
> rui
>>

Thanks Morimoto-san and Rui!
Patrick.


      reply	other threads:[~2014-03-05 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-28 13:10 [PATCH 0/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: minor fixes Patrick Titiano
2014-02-28 13:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: fix same mask applied twice Patrick Titiano
2014-02-28 13:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: update thermal zone only when temperature changes Patrick Titiano
2014-03-02 23:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: minor fixes Kuninori Morimoto
2014-03-03 14:51   ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-05 14:45     ` Patrick Titiano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53173892.90001@baylibre.com \
    --to=ptitiano@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
    --cc=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).