From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:05:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: add clock-indices support Message-Id: <5318C704.30108@codethink.co.uk> List-Id: References: <1392314571-30107-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1392314571-30107-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On 23/02/14 23:46, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2014-02-23 14:40:46) >> Hi Mike, >> >> On Sunday 23 February 2014 13:00:24 Mike Turquette wrote: >>> Quoting Ben Dooks (2014-02-13 10:02:49) >>> >>>> Add a property called clock-indices to allow clock-output-names >>>> to be used where the index used to lookup a clock is not a 1:1 >>>> mapping to the array position in the clock-output-names >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks >>> >>> Ben & Laurent, >>> >>> The clock-indices stuff looks sane to me. I've taken Ben's patch #1 into >>> clk-next. It seems patch #3 might be dropped and patch #2 didn't apply >>> cleanly for me. >>> >>> Can Laurent's patches and Ben's #2 be rebased and sent together as a PR? >> >> Sure. I've pushed my pending patches to >> >> git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git clocks/next/drivers >> >> Ben, could you please rebase your patch on top of it and repost ? I'll then >> send a pull request to Mike. > > FYI, I've just pushed a new clk-next branch based on -rc3 out to my > linaro remote. You don't need to rebase but it's there if you want to > put your stuff on top of the latest. Thanks. Will look at re-doing the reneasas clock driver as soon as we can get some discussion on the best way to deal with the merging. -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius